IRS Issues Interim Guidance on “Parking Tax”
As expected, the “imputed UBTI” is based on costs paid or incurred, not on the value of employee parking.
Notice 2018-99 says:
As described above, the great news is that depreciation is excluded from the costs that are aggregated in arriving at the imputed income.
Notice 2018-99 also includes a somewhat algebraic, four-step computation for determining the percentage of employee parking spaces and whether unused spaces may be included in the organization’s denominator. Each organization will need to work through the four-step framework (or another reasonable methodology) for computing their employee parking percentage, UBIT, or both.
Here’s an example from the Notice:
Example 9. Tax-Exempt Organization J, a religious organization that operates a church and a school, owns a surface parking lot adjacent to its buildings. J incurs $10,000 of total parking expenses. J’s parking lot has 500 spots that are used by its congregants, students, visitors, and employees, and 10 spots that are reserved for certain employees. During the normal hours of J’s activities on weekdays, J usually has approximately 50 employees parking in the lot in non-reserved spots and approximately 440 non-reserved parking spots that are empty. During the normal hours of J’s activities on weekends, J usually has approximately 400 congregants parking in the lot in non-reserved spots and 20 employees parking in the lot in non-reserved spots.
Step 1. Because J has 10 reserved spots for certain employees, $200 ((10/500) x $10,000 = $200) is the amount of total parking expenses that is nondeductible for reserved employee spots under § 274(a)(4). Thus, under § 512(a)(7), J must increase its UBTI by $200, the amount of the deduction disallowed under § 274(a)(4). [Note that Notice 2018-99 also offers organizations an opportunity to retroactively change employee parking arrangements until March 31, 2019. This may reduce or eliminate any additional unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) under IRC 512(a)(7) for some organizations.]
Step 2. Because usage of the parking spots varies significantly between days of the week, J uses a reasonable method to determine that the primary use of the remainder of J’s parking lot is to provide parking to the general public because 90% (440/490 = 90%) of the spots are used by the public during the weekdays and 95% (470/490) of the spots are used by the public on the weekends. The empty, non-reserved parking spots are treated as provided to the general public. Thus, expenses allocable to these spots are excepted from the § 274(a) disallowance by § 274(e)(7) under the primary use test, and only $200 of the $10,000 is subject to the § 274(a)(4) disallowance. Therefore, only $200 of the expenses for the provision of the QTF will result in an increase to UBTI under § 512(a)(7).
If J does not have gross income from any unrelated trades or businesses of $800 or more included in computing its UBTI (to reach the $1,000 filing threshold), J is not required to file a Form 990-T for that year.
Limited Penalty Relief for Estimated Payments
In addition, Notice 2018-100 includes limited penalty relief for some organizations who have not paid estimated payments that would have otherwise been owed for tax periods (or portions thereof) after December 31, 2017.
We are concerned about the wording in that Notice that states:
This could be a concern for organizations with a May 31, 2018, or June 30, 2018 year-end who did not file or extend Form 990-T at October 15, 2018, or November 15, 2018, and pay estimated taxes at those dates. The issue will likely be whether the fact that guidance was not issued until after the due date would qualify as reasonable cause or meet an exception under IRC section 6655.
We recommend that you work with your tax advisors on how the guidance under IRC section 512(a)(7) might affect your organization’s tax situations for years ending after December 31, 2017. The recent guidance provided in Notices 2018-99 and 2018-100 will affect each organization based upon its unique circumstances.
Note, too, that there is still a movement in Congress to repeal this law.Sign up for e-news and alerts